<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Abercrombie and Fitch Prank Video &#124; Shirtless Men Invade A+F</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webtvhub.com/abercrombie-and-fitch-prank-video-shirtless-men-invade-af/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webtvhub.com/abercrombie-and-fitch-prank-video-shirtless-men-invade-af/</link>
	<description>Internet Television and Online Video Entertainment Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:56:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: js</title>
		<link>http://www.webtvhub.com/abercrombie-and-fitch-prank-video-shirtless-men-invade-af/comment-page-1/#comment-48312</link>
		<dc:creator>js</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 22:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtvhub.com/abercrombie-and-fitch-prank-video-shirtless-men-invade-af/#comment-48312</guid>
		<description>The store workers at the end were putting their hands on the &quot;customers&quot; - although it became obvious to them that it was a prank and although a store can refuse service to anyone it pleases,  I wish some of the guys would have sued for discrimination. They would have had a case. No, really, they would have. It IS true that it&#039;s not aganist the law to be shirtless in public - hense the &quot;model&quot; hired for the front door. The abercrombie workers were probably worried that some of the pranksters were far superior in looks and physique to the &quot;model&quot; and for sure themselves. Abercrombie is full of pansies though...GREAT PRANK I LAUGHED AND LAUGHED!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The store workers at the end were putting their hands on the &#8220;customers&#8221; &#8211; although it became obvious to them that it was a prank and although a store can refuse service to anyone it pleases,  I wish some of the guys would have sued for discrimination. They would have had a case. No, really, they would have. It IS true that it&#8217;s not aganist the law to be shirtless in public &#8211; hense the &#8220;model&#8221; hired for the front door. The abercrombie workers were probably worried that some of the pranksters were far superior in looks and physique to the &#8220;model&#8221; and for sure themselves. Abercrombie is full of pansies though&#8230;GREAT PRANK I LAUGHED AND LAUGHED!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

